<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: History of Calc Solver</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/</link>
	<description>Kohei Yoshida&#039;s Webspace</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenOffice.org, comentemos un poco la version 3.0 &#124; Gustavo Pimentel&#39;s GNU/Linux Blog</title>
		<link>http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/comment-page-1/#comment-10503</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenOffice.org, comentemos un poco la version 3.0 &#124; Gustavo Pimentel&#39;s GNU/Linux Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 13:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/#comment-10503</guid>
		<description>[...] Una sexta novedad, viene del modulo &quot;Calc&quot; (Planilla de Calculos) que, a partir de ahora, acepta las hojas de 1024 columnas (contra las 256 que ofrecía antes); y, permite un trabajo colaborativo en las hojas de calculo. Hay un solver que permite resolver los problemas de optimizacion y que pasa a integrar el modulo mismo (un código que se hizo esperar mucho, pues debió estar antes, ver articulo titulado :&quot;History of Calc solver&quot;). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Una sexta novedad, viene del modulo &quot;Calc&quot; (Planilla de Calculos) que, a partir de ahora, acepta las hojas de 1024 columnas (contra las 256 que ofrecía antes); y, permite un trabajo colaborativo en las hojas de calculo. Hay un solver que permite resolver los problemas de optimizacion y que pasa a integrar el modulo mismo (un código que se hizo esperar mucho, pues debió estar antes, ver articulo titulado :&quot;History of Calc solver&quot;). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pablog's status on Saturday, 30-May-09 12:29:52 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/comment-page-1/#comment-9232</link>
		<dc:creator>pablog's status on Saturday, 30-May-09 12:29:52 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 12:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/#comment-9232</guid>
		<description>[...] &quot;History of calc solver&quot;: http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &quot;History of calc solver&quot;: <a href="http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/" rel="nofollow">http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Informiraj.ME &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Projekt Openoffice.org je bolan</title>
		<link>http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/comment-page-1/#comment-8900</link>
		<dc:creator>Informiraj.ME &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Projekt Openoffice.org je bolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/#comment-8900</guid>
		<description>[...] Kot razlog, zakaj ni ve&#269; zunanje pomo&#269;i, v glavnem navaja Sun-ov izkori&#353;&#269;evalski odnos do zunanjih programerjev, med drugim tudi njegovega sodelavca v Novell-u. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kot razlog, zakaj ni ve&#269; zunanje pomo&#269;i, v glavnem navaja Sun-ov izkori&#353;&#269;evalski odnos do zunanjih programerjev, med drugim tudi njegovega sodelavca v Novell-u. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shadow</title>
		<link>http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/comment-page-1/#comment-8899</link>
		<dc:creator>shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 05:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/#comment-8899</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you Kohei, Sun is pathetic!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you Kohei, Sun is pathetic!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Source Reporter &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Go-OO :: An office suite you use, but dont know of&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/comment-page-1/#comment-8821</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source Reporter &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Go-OO :: An office suite you use, but dont know of&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/#comment-8821</guid>
		<description>[...] constraints. OpenOffice.org now has its own, but the one in Go-OO appeared first and has quite a story of its own, showing disagreements between Sun and independent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] constraints. OpenOffice.org now has its own, but the one in Go-OO appeared first and has quite a story of its own, showing disagreements between Sun and independent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gustavo Enrique Pimentel &#187; Archive du blog &#187; OpenOffice.org, comentemos un poco la version 3.0</title>
		<link>http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/comment-page-1/#comment-8602</link>
		<dc:creator>Gustavo Enrique Pimentel &#187; Archive du blog &#187; OpenOffice.org, comentemos un poco la version 3.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/#comment-8602</guid>
		<description>[...] Una sexta novedad, viene del modulo &#8220;Calc&#8221; (Planilla de Calculos) que, a partir de ahora, acepta las hojas de 1024 columnas (contra las 256 que ofrecía antes); y, permite un trabajo colaborativo en las hojas de calculo. Hay un solver que permite resolver los problemas de optimizacion y que pasa a integrar el modulo mismo (un código que se hizo esperar mucho, pues debió estar antes, ver articulo titulado :&#8221;History of Calc solver&#8220;). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Una sexta novedad, viene del modulo &#8220;Calc&#8221; (Planilla de Calculos) que, a partir de ahora, acepta las hojas de 1024 columnas (contra las 256 que ofrecía antes); y, permite un trabajo colaborativo en las hojas de calculo. Hay un solver que permite resolver los problemas de optimizacion y que pasa a integrar el modulo mismo (un código que se hizo esperar mucho, pues debió estar antes, ver articulo titulado :&#8221;History of Calc solver&#8220;). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kin</title>
		<link>http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/comment-page-1/#comment-1404</link>
		<dc:creator>kin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/#comment-1404</guid>
		<description>Is quite interesting that the first part involved in this fork battle for GPL was Novell,
the same Novell that is still not GPL-3 compliant, and still searching alternative ways
to licence open source that only Novell can distribute (Moonlight? )....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is quite interesting that the first part involved in this fork battle for GPL was Novell,<br />
the same Novell that is still not GPL-3 compliant, and still searching alternative ways<br />
to licence open source that only Novell can distribute (Moonlight? )&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gnegg</title>
		<link>http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/comment-page-1/#comment-964</link>
		<dc:creator>gnegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/#comment-964</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Closed Source on Linux...&lt;/strong&gt;

One of the developers behind the Linux port of the new Flex Builder for Linux has a blog post about how building closed source software for linux is hard
Mostly, all the problems boil down to the fact that Linux distributors keep patching the upstream...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Closed Source on Linux&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>One of the developers behind the Linux port of the new Flex Builder for Linux has a blog post about how building closed source software for linux is hard<br />
Mostly, all the problems boil down to the fact that Linux distributors keep patching the upstream&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Thurgood</title>
		<link>http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/comment-page-1/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Thurgood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 21:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/#comment-871</guid>
		<description>@Simon Phipps
As an intellectual property attorney in private practice, I think I fully understand the establishment of client relationships ;-) I have never asked advice directly of Sun Legal since I know of no-one within that group, my previous questions have mostly been aimed at them via the Sun Development team, since there seems to be no other way of doing that within the project. Indeed, my questions/comments would have been mostly in a professional capacity from one lawyer to another, the answers or replies to which could easily have been made under the cover of professional privilege. Sun Legal has never contacted me on any of these issues, possibly because they were never even relayed back to them via the project. That basically shows that Sun, as an entity, prefers to keep these things to itself, rather than discuss them with like-minded professionals, even those sworn to professional secrecy. I make no claim to anything other than that, I represent none of the companies involved in the project, nor any of its opponents, and still less any other volunteer organisation. I am &quot;my own man&quot;, as one might say. Perhaps therein lies the stumbling block ;-) In the end, it doesn&#039;t matter to me one hoot, I have decided to withdraw from the project, at least from much of what I was doing until now, like many others, in an entirely voluntary capacity. Seven years on and we still have a monolith deciding what does or does not &quot;belong&quot; - the other corporations involved aren&#039;t saints either, far from it, I&#039;m not that naïve to believe in that, there&#039;s always some other &quot;interest&quot; for a corporation to participate in a project like this than just sheer altruism. I can live with that, but I have decided to live without it, at least until such time as the &quot;house&quot; can be brought into order.

Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Simon Phipps<br />
As an intellectual property attorney in private practice, I think I fully understand the establishment of client relationships ;-) I have never asked advice directly of Sun Legal since I know of no-one within that group, my previous questions have mostly been aimed at them via the Sun Development team, since there seems to be no other way of doing that within the project. Indeed, my questions/comments would have been mostly in a professional capacity from one lawyer to another, the answers or replies to which could easily have been made under the cover of professional privilege. Sun Legal has never contacted me on any of these issues, possibly because they were never even relayed back to them via the project. That basically shows that Sun, as an entity, prefers to keep these things to itself, rather than discuss them with like-minded professionals, even those sworn to professional secrecy. I make no claim to anything other than that, I represent none of the companies involved in the project, nor any of its opponents, and still less any other volunteer organisation. I am &#8220;my own man&#8221;, as one might say. Perhaps therein lies the stumbling block ;-) In the end, it doesn&#8217;t matter to me one hoot, I have decided to withdraw from the project, at least from much of what I was doing until now, like many others, in an entirely voluntary capacity. Seven years on and we still have a monolith deciding what does or does not &#8220;belong&#8221; &#8211; the other corporations involved aren&#8217;t saints either, far from it, I&#8217;m not that naïve to believe in that, there&#8217;s always some other &#8220;interest&#8221; for a corporation to participate in a project like this than just sheer altruism. I can live with that, but I have decided to live without it, at least until such time as the &#8220;house&#8221; can be brought into order.</p>
<p>Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/comment-page-1/#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/#comment-841</guid>
		<description>I see now that Michael Meeks has commented in detail on the JCA and the SCA.  No-one at Sun (except their FAQ) seems to be offering reassurance that their won&#039;t be proprietary works deriving from a contribution

http://www.gnome.org/~michael/activity.html#2007-10-09</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see now that Michael Meeks has commented in detail on the JCA and the SCA.  No-one at Sun (except their FAQ) seems to be offering reassurance that their won&#8217;t be proprietary works deriving from a contribution</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gnome.org/~michael/activity.html#2007-10-09" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnome.org/~michael/activity.html#2007-10-09</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

